Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorÖzkan, Aysun
dc.contributor.authorBanar, Müfide
dc.contributor.editorKlemes, JJ
dc.contributor.editorLam, HL
dc.contributor.editorVarbanov, PS
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-21T20:11:12Z
dc.date.available2019-10-21T20:11:12Z
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.isbn978-88-95608-05-1
dc.identifier.issn1974-9791
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.3303/CET1021129
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11421/20124
dc.description13th Conference on Process Integration, Modelling and Optimisation for Energy Saving and Pollution Reduction -- AUG 28-SEP 01, 2010 -- Prague, CZECH REPUBLICen_US
dc.descriptionWOS: 000286978600129en_US
dc.description.abstractOne of the main methods for utilizing waste is its use as an energy source. Waste is only suitable for use as a fuel if it has chemical energy content. This energy content depends most of all on the size of the (organic) combustible fraction and on the moisture content. To better employ the chemical energy contained in wastes, alternative fuels have been developed which are mixtures of different wastes. Refuse-derived fuel (RDF) or solid recovered fuel/ specified recovered fuel (SRF) is a fuel produced by shredding and mixing municipal solid waste (MSW) or industrial waste. RDF can be used in a variety of ways to produce electricity. It can be used alongside traditional sources of fuel in coal power plants. RDF can be co-incinerated in the cement kiln industry, where the strict standards of the waste incineration directive are met. That is, the desire to reduce total fuel costs through substitution of RDF for the normal fossil fuels, primarily coal, used in these facilities. Internationally, RDF has complied with Kyoto Protocol measures and is considered a renewable fuel. In this study, Analytic Network Process (ANP) that is one of the Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) tools has been used to evaluate for RDF utilization in cement industry. For this purpose, following scenarios were occurred: Scenario 1: using of coal as a fuel; Scenario 2: using alternatives fuels (discarded as waste tyre, oil waste etc.); Scenario 3a: using of 10 % RDF and 90 % coal as a fuel; Scenario 3b: using of 40 % RDF and 60 % coal as a fuel; Scenario 3c: using of 100 % RDF as a fuel. Super Decision Software has been used for the evaluation of these scenarios and Benefit Opportunity Cost and Risk (BOCR) analysis has been done to apply ANP. In BOCR analysis, each scenario has been evaluated in terms of its benefits, costs and risks; the opportunity cluster has been examined under benefit cluster. In this context, technical, economical and social assessments have been done for the RDF utilization in cement industry. According to this assessments, the scenario 3c (% 100 RDF) was found as the best scenario.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAIDICen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherAidic Servizi Srlen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesChemical Engineering Transactions
dc.relation.isversionof10.3303/CET1021129en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleRefuse Derived Fuel (RDF) Utilization in Cement Industry by Using Analytic Network Process (ANP)en_US
dc.typeconferenceObjecten_US
dc.relation.journalPres 2010: 13th International Conference On Process Integration, Modelling and Optimisation For Energy Saving and Pollution Reductionen_US
dc.contributor.departmentAnadolu Üniversitesi, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Çevre Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.identifier.volume21en_US
dc.identifier.startpage769en_US
dc.identifier.endpage774en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryKonferans Öğesi - Uluslararası - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorÖzkan, Aysun
dc.contributor.institutionauthorBanar, Müfide


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster