Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorCan, Emre
dc.contributor.authorÜzmez, Özlem Özden
dc.contributor.authorDöğeroğlu, Tuncay
dc.contributor.authorGaga, Eftade Emine
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-21T20:11:03Z
dc.date.available2019-10-21T20:11:03Z
dc.date.issued2015
dc.identifier.issn1309-1042
dc.identifier.urihttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apr.2015.05.008
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11421/20061
dc.descriptionWOS: 000372527700014en_US
dc.description.abstractMeasurements for indoor air quality assessment were carried out in Painting and Printmaking Department of Anadolu University Faculty of Fine Arts in Turkey. Concentrations of nitrogen dioxide (NO2), ozone (O-3) and 29 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) were measured simultaneously by using diffusive samplers. Simultaneous outdoor measurements were also performed at some sampling points. Analyses of NO2 and ozone samples were performed by using ion chromatography and VOCs were analyzed by using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Indoor NO2 and ozone concentrations varied between 13.47-89.77 mu g m(-3) and 3.89-51.82 mu g m(-3), respectively. Average indoor NO2 concentration was obtained as 35.37 +/- 10.9 mu g m(-3). Indoor/outdoor NO2 ratio (I/O) was found as 1.44 +/- 0.4 which indicated the presence of some indoor sources. Average indoor ozone concentration was 9.97 +/- 4.4 mu g m(-3) and I/O ratio was obtained lower than 1 (0.46 +/- 0.4). The highest VOC concentrations were observed at workshops where oil painting and stained glass studies were performed. Especially, the concentrations obtained from the stained glass workshop (benzene: 3.98 +/- 1.3 mu g m(-3), toluene: 999.33 +/- 104.2 mu g m(-3), ethly benzene: 66.06 +/- 16.1 mu g m(-3), m,p xylene: 129.44 +/- 33.1 mu g m(-3), o-xylene: 76.14 +/- 23.1 mu g m(-3)) were much higher than the other sampling points. Toluene concentrations exceeded the WHO (World Health Organization) limit value (260 mu g m(-3) weekly average) at 40% of the sampling points. Cancer risks were estimated by using the personal exposure concentrations. Lifetime cancer risks for the people working in the department such as faculty members and technicians were obtained higher than USEPA acceptable risk value (1 x 10(-6)) while the risks for the students were below this value. Copyright (c) 2015 Turkish National Committee for Air Pollution Research and Control. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherTurkish Natl Committee Air Pollution Res & Control-Tuncapen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.apr.2015.05.008en_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectIndoor Air Qualityen_US
dc.subjectFine Artsen_US
dc.subjectPainting And Printmaking Departmenten_US
dc.subjectDiffusive Samplingen_US
dc.titleIndoor air quality assessment in painting and printmaking department of a fine arts faculty buildingen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalAtmospheric Pollution Researchen_US
dc.contributor.departmentAnadolu Üniversitesi, Mühendislik Fakültesi, Çevre Mühendisliği Bölümüen_US
dc.identifier.volume6en_US
dc.identifier.issue6en_US
dc.identifier.startpage1035en_US
dc.identifier.endpage1045en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorDöğeroğlu, Tuncay
dc.contributor.institutionauthorGaga, Eftade Emine


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster