Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorAcar, Şinasi
dc.contributor.authorÖzveri, Murat
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-20T14:28:49Z
dc.date.available2019-10-20T14:28:49Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.issn1303-3123
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.trdizin.gov.tr/publication/paper/detail/T1RneE5ERXg=
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11421/18252
dc.description.abstractThe article is based on a court record dated 1705, and is about the inheritance of a Janissary bowmaker, Yusuf Beshe. This document reveals the bows made in 17th-18th century Istanbul, the tools and the materials a bowery needed and their cost. This information not only confirms our knowledge about the traditional Turkish bowmaking technique, but the related material and tools. It also proves that Crimean Tartar bows were made in the Ottoman capital city. Crimean Tartars were the allies of the Ottomans and contributed the Ottoman army in the battle as fronteers. This document shows that these bows that are structurally different from the classical Ottoman bows, were also made in İstanbul, a fact that would bring an explanation to some old reports about long-draw Turkish bows. Another important point about Turkish bowmaking history is a bow type called the Mameluke bow which had not been mentioned yet in known sources. This article provides an evidence-based analysis about its possible identity and its use.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe article is based on a court record dated 1705, and is about the inheritance of a Janissary bowmaker, Yusuf Beshe. This document reveals the bows made in 17th-18th century Istanbul, the tools and the materials a bowery needed and their cost. This information not only confirms our knowledge about the traditional Turkish bowmaking technique, but the related material and tools. It also proves that Crimean Tartar bows were made in the Ottoman capital city. Crimean Tartars were the allies of the Ottomans and contributed the Ottoman army in the battle as fronteers. This document shows that these bows that are structurally different from the classical Ottoman bows, were also made in İstanbul, a fact that would bring an explanation to some old reports about long-draw Turkish bows. Another important point about Turkish bowmaking history is a bow type called the Mameluke bow which had not been mentioned yet in known sources. This article provides an evidence-based analysis about its possible identity and its use.en_US
dc.language.isoturen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectSosyal Bilimler Tarihien_US
dc.titleYaycı Yusuf Beşe terekesinin düşündürdüklerien_US
dc.title.alternativeInheritance record of Yusuf Beshe,an Ottoman bowmaker of late 17th centuryen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalOsmanlı Bilimi Araştırmalarıen_US
dc.contributor.departmentAnadolu Üniversitesi, Güzel Sanatlar Fakültesien_US
dc.identifier.volume9en_US
dc.identifier.issue1-2en_US
dc.identifier.startpage119en_US
dc.identifier.endpage136en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US]


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster