| dc.contributor.author | Taşdelen, İskender | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2019-10-19T16:03:13Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2019-10-19T16:03:13Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
| dc.identifier.issn | 1301-0875 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://www.trdizin.gov.tr/publication/paper/detail/T1Rnd05qZzQ= | |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11421/14079 | |
| dc.description.abstract | Based on a distinction according to each philosopher's choice, while a part of contemporary logic named "symbolic logic" is accepted as a tool for philosophy, another part called "mathematical logic", is regarded as a part of mathematics. Although mathematician-logicians agree upon the issues that mathematical logic should cover, that they do not have a reliable definition of mathematical logic can be seen in the two 'definitions' provided by Crossley and Shoenfield. | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Based on a distinction according to each philosopher's choice, while a part of contemporary logic named "symbolic logic" is accepted as a tool for philosophy, another part called "mathematical logic", is regarded as a part of mathematics. Although mathematician-logicians agree upon the issues that mathematical logic should cover, that they do not have a reliable definition of mathematical logic can be seen in the two 'definitions' provided by Crossley and Shoenfield. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | tur | en_US |
| dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | en_US |
| dc.subject | Felsefe | en_US |
| dc.title | Matematiksel ( ? ) Mantık | en_US |
| dc.type | article | en_US |
| dc.relation.journal | Felsefe Dünyası | en_US |
| dc.contributor.department | Anadolu Üniversitesi, Edebiyat Fakültesi, Felsefe Bölümü | en_US |
| dc.identifier.volume | 0 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.issue | 49 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.startpage | 81 | en_US |
| dc.identifier.endpage | 89 | en_US |
| dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Ulusal Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | en_US] |
