Gelişmiş Arama

Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorBerberoğlu, Bahar
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-18T19:26:17Z
dc.date.available2019-10-18T19:26:17Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.issn1303-6521
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11421/11439
dc.description.abstractIn this study, we examined the status of the European Union and Turkey on the basis of the variables within the scope of Lifelong Learning. We used the k-means cluster analysis and the discriminant analysis, which are multivariate statistical techniques, in our study. When we separated our dataset into 4 clusters, we found our success of correct clustering as 97.0%. We saw in our analysis that Denmark, the Netherlands, Iceland and Switzerland had the best positions and constituted the top cluster. While the second best cluster contained countries such as Germany, France, Sweden and Norway, Turkey ranked in the cluster right above the lowest one together with 9 European Countries. The lowest cluster was comprised by 12 European countriesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherSakarya Universityen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.titleLifelong learning in Europeen_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.relation.journalTurkish Online Journal of Educational Technologyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentAnadolu Üniversitesi, Açıköğretim Fakültesien_US
dc.identifier.volume2016en_US
dc.identifier.issueDecemberSpecialIssueen_US
dc.identifier.startpage61en_US
dc.identifier.endpage68en_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.contributor.institutionauthorBerberoğlu, Bahar


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

DosyalarBoyutBiçimGöster

Bu öğe ile ilişkili dosya yok.

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster